Aleela
09-11-08, 13:34
Here is something I have discovered. You might have already, but anyway………..
I have a Canon D20, I have fitted to this a Metz
45CL - 4 DIGITAL Flashgun. OK. A good kit? Yep, it seems to be fine, BUT on my lenses I have the standard filters, but I also have PLARISER filters, bearing in mind the flash has been connected to the cameras set on TTL (through the lens), I have also used the set in Manual mode. I have always had a hate relationship with the printing of the pics, so have generally chucked the camera in the corner and ignored it, on studio lights the images are fine sharp well lit across the board and tremendously different from the Metz’s flash pics.
I was in Cardiff on Friday, and took my camera to a shop there, and asked had I missed a setting up step or something???
NO
OH?
Polariser filter
Come again? Is not the signal from the lens transmitted to the flash gun???
YES/NO
?
The only information fed to the flash, is focal length aperture
B****Y HELL, I still find it incredulous, that as a professional set up, the addition of a polariser can throw a spanner in the works, as far as I am concerned, it SHOULD WORK, but in testing over the last day or so, it does seem to muck up the lighting when the filter is added, and if you look at the Histogram, when the filter is added, you get no detail in the white area, I have even tried to use a slower shutter, 2.8 instead 5.6 all to no avail.
So has anyone come across this paradox? Alex
I have a Canon D20, I have fitted to this a Metz
45CL - 4 DIGITAL Flashgun. OK. A good kit? Yep, it seems to be fine, BUT on my lenses I have the standard filters, but I also have PLARISER filters, bearing in mind the flash has been connected to the cameras set on TTL (through the lens), I have also used the set in Manual mode. I have always had a hate relationship with the printing of the pics, so have generally chucked the camera in the corner and ignored it, on studio lights the images are fine sharp well lit across the board and tremendously different from the Metz’s flash pics.
I was in Cardiff on Friday, and took my camera to a shop there, and asked had I missed a setting up step or something???
NO
OH?
Polariser filter
Come again? Is not the signal from the lens transmitted to the flash gun???
YES/NO
?
The only information fed to the flash, is focal length aperture
B****Y HELL, I still find it incredulous, that as a professional set up, the addition of a polariser can throw a spanner in the works, as far as I am concerned, it SHOULD WORK, but in testing over the last day or so, it does seem to muck up the lighting when the filter is added, and if you look at the Histogram, when the filter is added, you get no detail in the white area, I have even tried to use a slower shutter, 2.8 instead 5.6 all to no avail.
So has anyone come across this paradox? Alex